Figure 1. Schematic graph of describing consolidated drained triaxial compression (CD) tests on sand with different densities
Figure 2. Comparison between measured data from isotropic compression tests for clays and sands and predicted values by CSUH model
Figure 3. NCL and its curvature K in CSUH model
Figure 4. Change of NCL and CSL with ps
Figure 5. Evolution of state variable ξ in CD tests on sand
Figure 6. Schematic graph of describing volume strain compression and dilation by unified hardening parameter H during strain harding (dq > 0)
Figure 7. Transform stress method
Figure 8. Comparison between constant p compression test results of Fujinormori clay and predicted values by CSUH model
Figure 9. Comparison between measured results of true triaxial tests under constant p stress path with different medium principal stress coefficient b of Fujinormori clay and the predicted values by CSUH model
Figure 10. Comparison between measured results of consolidated drained triaxial compression (CD) tests of LCT clay and.predicted values by CSUH model
Figure 11. Comparison between measured results of consolidated undrained triaxial compression (CU) tests of LCT clay and predicted values by CSUH model
Figure 12. Comparison between measured results of CD tests of calcareous silt and predicted values by CSUH model
Figure 13. Comparison between measured results of CU tests of calcareous silt and predicted values by CSUH model
Figure 14. Comparison between measured results of CD tests of Toyoura sand and predicted values by CSUH model
Figure 15. Comparison between measured results of CU tests of Toyoura sand and predicted values by CSUH model
Figure 16. Comparison between measured results of CU tests of Ottawa sand and predicted values by CSUH
Figure 17. Comparison between measured results of CU tests of Ottawa sand and predicted values by CSUH model
Figure 18. Comparison between measured results of tests under combination path of CU and constant p stress path of Ottawa sand and predicted values by CSUH
Figure 19. Comparison between measured results of isotropic compression tests of rockfill from the Changhe dam and predicted values by CSUH
Figure 20. Comparison between measured results of consolidated drained triaxial compression (CD) tests of rockfill from Changhe dam and predicted values by CSUH model
Figure 21. Comparison between measured results of consolidated undrained triaxial compression (CU) tests of rockfill from Changhe dam and predicted values by CSUH model
Figure 22. Comparison between measured results of consolidated drained triaxial compression (CD) tests of rockfill from Yixing dam and predicted values by CSUH model
Figure 23. Comparison between measured results of constant p tests of rockfill of Yixing dam and predicted values of CSUH model